Watershed Forestry Resource Guide now available on the web December 17, 2008
Posted by bruce mcgranahan in forestry, pollution control, water.Tags: stormwater, forestry, watershed
add a comment
The good folks at the Center for Watershed Protection and the US Forest Services have joined forces to bring us a new forestry resource.
THE WATERSHED FORESTRY RESOURCE GUIDE is a central clearinghouse for all things related to forests and watersheds. Recent efforts towards managing urban forests for watershed health have resulted in a variety of highly useful tools and training materials. This site compiles these resources into a format that can be easily accessed and downloaded.

In case you’re wondering what the big deal is about forests…
Trees are the oldest and largest living things on the earth, and they are a good measure of the health and quality of our environment. Urban forests are located on public and private land right in our own back yard. They line our city streets and highways; make our towns, parks and recreation areas beautiful; and add life to the landscape of concrete. Urban trees help to clean the air of pollution and provide oxygen. They reduce stormwater runoff and when located properly they can even lower heating and cooling costs. As urbanization and sprawl expands into rural areas of our watersheds, forests become an increasingly important resource to all who live there.
The site is organized by four major categories.
1. Forest Planning and Assessment
- Do you need help setting an urban tree canopy goal for your community?
- Are you unsure how to prioritize planting locations and forest conservation tracts in your watershed?
- Do you need training materials to teach others how to estimate future impacts to forests from development?
2. Reducing Stormwater Runoff
- Do you want to learn how trees can help reduce stormwater runoff?
- Are you interested in incorporating trees into your stormwater treatment practices?
- Are you looking for some examples of stormwater credit systems for trees?
3. Forest Friendly Development
- Do you want to make your community’s codes and ordinances more forest friendly?
- Do you need help preserving trees at a development site in your community?
- Are you looking for examples of forest friendly communities to convince your elected officials to change local regulations?
4. Planting and Maintaining Trees
- Do you want to know the correct way to plant a tree?
- Are you unsure what species to plant or where to plant it?
- Do you need some tools to teach others how to plant and maintain trees?
Global Warming will require new management methods to protect our drinking water supplies October 6, 2008
Posted by bruce mcgranahan in climate change, water.Tags: Drinking water, global warming, Water supply
1 comment so far
Via Alternet …
An EPA Report, “National Water Program Strategy: Response to Climate Change“, describes the impacts of Global Warming on water. It ain’t pretty and it’s going to be quite a challenge for local governments and utilities to protect our drinking water in the face of these changes. According to the report Global Warming will affect our water in several ways:
- More intense storms will threaten drinking water systems and increase polluted runoff.
- Shorelines will move inland from rising sea levels
- Changes in ocean chemistry will alter aquatic habitat and fisheries.
- Warmer water will likely change contaminant concentrations in water.
- New patterns of rainfall and snowfall are expected to alter water supply for drinking and other uses.
- Heavier precipitation in tropical and inland storms will increase the risks of flooding, expand floodplains, increase the variability of streamflows, increase the velocity of water during high flow periods and increase erosion.
- These changes will have adverse effects on clean water and aquatic ecosystems.
- Intense rainfall will result in more pollution, pathogens, and toxins being washed into waterbodies.
As a result, the strategy advises, city and county water managers will need to plan for extreme weather resulting in excess of water or a lack of water. EPA’s “National Water Program Strategy: Response to Climate Change” describes steps for managers to adapt their clean water, drinking water, and ocean protection programs, but it is not a rule or regulation and is not legally binding. The new strategy focuses on 44 specific actions for the National Water Program to take in responding to climate change. They fall within five topic areas — mitigation, adaptation, research, the education of water program professionals on climate change issues and management of climate change work within the National Water Program.
To view the 119-page National Water Program Strategy: Response to Climate Change, go HERE.
Guide to the world’s water crisis October 5, 2008
Posted by bruce mcgranahan in water.Tags: Drinking water, water, Water resources
add a comment
Water Consciousness is a solution-focused guide to the world’s greatest environmental crisis. This book includes straightforward essays written by the world’s leading environmentalists and stunning photographs illuminating our global water crisis and solutions. For more info, visit the Water Consciousness page.
Water Consciousness: How We All Have to Change to Protect Our Most Critical Resource
Published: Aug 25, 2008
America’s water use by sector July 29, 2008
Posted by bruce mcgranahan in water.Tags: water, wise water use
add a comment
US Drought Monitor online July 2, 2008
Posted by bruce mcgranahan in climate change, water.Tags: climate, drought, weather
add a comment
The U.S. Drought Summary released June 17 provides the following:
Mid-Atlantic and Southeast: The searing heat eased up during the period, particularly in the northern reaches of the region. Rainfall also increased, but was primarily associated with scattered to isolated showers and thundershowers. Thus, there was a wide range of precipitation totals observed for the 7-day period. Many locations picked up 0.5 to 3.0 inches of precipitation, but a fair number of sites received less while isolated locations across southern Georgia and southern Florida reported as much as 6 inches of rain. The scattered nature of the precipitation means that there will be some variability in dry conditions on a scale too small to depict on our national map. However, significant rainfall was widespread enough to erase D1 conditions in northern Florida and drop D2 conditions to D1 across central Alabama. Furthermore, surface moisture increases were noted across Florida and near the central Gulf Coast, but hydrologic conditions, which respond to precipitation on longer time scales, remained essentially unchanged. As a result, the D0AH to D2AH conditions in these areas were reclassified as D0H to D2H, and some limited improvements were introduced. In contrast, rainfall totals were relatively low across western South Carolina and much of interior North Carolina, resulting in the introduction of exceptional drought (D4) near the Carolinas’ border, and the eastward expansion of D1 to D3 conditions farther east in the Carolinas. Similarly, generally light precipitation led to the expansion of D1 across central and eastern Georgia, the introduction of D1 in east-central Louisiana, and the expansion of abnormal dryness across northern Louisiana.
Wetlands: Workhorses for flood and pollution control June 29, 2008
Posted by bruce mcgranahan in land use, water.Tags: flood control, water, wetlands
1 comment so far
Swamps and Bogs. It conjures up visions of mist rising from dark, gloomy, mysterious places. For centuries “wetlands” were places to hide; to lose your way; or be eaten by monsters that lurked there. In fact, we have now discovered that wetlands have many purposes and provide a multitude of benefits to humans and the environment. With all the news recently about flooding in the Mid-West we need to be reminded that wetlands are natural buffers against flooding. This post at the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel is focused on Wisconsin’s wetlands but the points made apply to the Mid-Atlantic as well.
Save and expand wetlands to help state with flood control
By LAURA ENGLAND
Posted: June 21, 2008
The recent historic rainfall and flooding in southern Wisconsin came far too soon on the heels of flooding last August. Then, citizens and organizations called for changes in the way we manage our landscapes and waters, but these calls were forgotten once the mud dried.
For the health of our state economy and the health and safety of our citizenry, we must act now, with major state commitments to prevent the recurrence of severe flooding. Wetlands are a critical component of the long-term solution.
No matter who you are or where you live, wetlands affect your life. Like sponges, they soak up and store rain that runs off of our lands. Wetlands include marshes, swamps, bogs, fens and sedge meadows, all with the capacity to store rainwater, an economically significant function that is important to human health and safety. According to the Environmental Protection Agency, one acre of wetlands, on average, can store 1 million gallons of water.
Unfortunately, Wisconsin has lost nearly 50% of its original 10 million wetland acres due to draining, ditching and filling to make way for farmland, development and other land uses. We have lost 5 trillion gallons of storage capacity that wetlands provided naturally and free of charge. This loss equates to the amount of water that would cover Lambeau Field to a depth of more than 2,200 miles. It is also the equivalent of 7.6 million Olympic-sized swimming pools or 8,333 Lake Deltons.
Wetlands are flood prevention workhorses, but we are asking too much of the remaining wetlands. The severity of current floods is the not-so-surprising result of a perfect storm of human actions, including reduced water storage capacity resulting from wetland loss; increased runoff from paved and hard surfaces, which converts rainfall into runoff and delivers larger and more rapid floods to lakes, streams and rivers; and more frequent heavy rains in the Midwest, an expected consequence of climate change.
It is clear that Wisconsin’s remaining wetlands are in over their heads.
It is worth noting that Iowa, which has suffered far greater flood damage than Wisconsin, has lost more than 90% of its original wetlands through draining and filling. While there certainly are other factors that made recent floods more extreme in Iowa, the severe lack of wetland storage capacity was undoubtedly a significant factor.
Will Wisconsin remain on a path toward Iowa, with continued wetlands losses, or will we dedicate significant resources toward achieving the state Department of Natural Resource’s strategy on wetlands, reversing the loss?
Annually, we still destroy about 95 wetland acres each year through private land projects (the average between 2001 and 2006) and 175 acres for Department of Transportation road projects (1990 to 2005 average). That’s an annual loss of 270 million gallons of storage capacity — more than 400 Olympic-sized swimming pools.
The location of wetlands also is critical — wetlands must be distributed throughout watersheds for effective flood prevention. The more water storage capacity higher up within a watershed, the greater the probability of preventing flooding in major rivers and lakes located at the low points within watersheds. Studies of wetland mitigation, a practice in which the loss of wetland acres on a building site is offset by the creation or restoration of wetland acres elsewhere, have shown that mitigation consistently fails to replace wetland functions.
Wisconsin needs a paradigm shift to plan its communities around existing water resources rather than to engineer waters to fit around our communities. The latter is considerably more costly and makes our communities more vulnerable to natural disasters. In addition to preventing floods, wetlands provide natural water purification, groundwater recharge, shoreline protection and wildlife habitat and support our economy through recreational activities like hunting, fishing, paddling and birding.
Wisconsin Wetlands Association urges concerted planning efforts to determine where wetlands are needed most for future flood prevention; to develop a state goal for wetland acres to be restored and make significant financial commitments to this goal; to provide incentives for private landowners to hold and restore wetlands that provide flood prevention benefits to their communities; and to deepen the commitment to preventing wetland loss and to ensure effective replacement of wetland functions when destruction is unavoidable.
Wisconsin is in grave need of more wetland horsepower. We no longer can afford the consequences of the status quo; it is time to make a serious commitment to increasing wetland acreage.
Laura England is outreach programs director for the Wisconsin Wetlands Association of Madison.
Submerged tree stumps reveal depth of historic drought in Western US June 29, 2008
Posted by bruce mcgranahan in climate change, water.Tags: climate change, drought, water
add a comment
According to Recordnet.com, “Trees hidden beneath the waters of Sierra Nevada lakes suggest California, and most of the West, experienced “megadroughts” that put our current water crisis in context. Water levels dropped so low that trees began growing as much as 70 feet below the current surface of one Sierra lake, researchers say.
Scott Stine, a geographer with California State University, East Bay, says our entire perception of California’s climate may be off. “What we have come to consider normal is profoundly wet,” Stine told National Geographic magazine earlier this year. “We’re kidding ourselves if we think that’s going to continue, with or without global warming.”
Sussex County Delaware moves to protect groundwater June 29, 2008
Posted by bruce mcgranahan in water.Tags: water, Water resources, Water supply
1 comment so far
The County Council in Sussex County Delaware approved a plan June 24th to protect underground drinking water supplies from contamination that can come from activities like development.
Sussex County Administrator David B. Baker said he and other county officials have been working with state water resources officials to make sure the ordinance complies.
“This is an important step in protecting not just the public’s health, but also in guaranteeing the safety of one of our most important natural resources,” David Baker said. “This works to protect Sussex County’s drinking water supply for our residents today and for future Sussex countians.”
The ordinance creates safety zones that range from a 20- to 100-foot radius around wells that supply public drinking water. The ordinance depends upon state maps that show the best recharge areas and the locations of wells. <MORE>










