jump to navigation

EcoClad siding is a green alternative January 28, 2009

Posted by bruce mcgranahan in green building.
Tags:
1 comment so far

EcoClad siding is constructed of post-consumer paper products and dense, sustainable bamboo fibers, allowing for outstanding durability and water resistance—not to mention the peace of mind that you’re protecting natural resources.  This greener alternative to more conventional siding is LEED certified.  Learn more HERE

http://www.kliptech.com/images/c_highres7.jpg

http://www.kliptech.com/images/c_highres2.jpg

Enhanced by Zemanta

Free E-book “Green Building 101″ November 9, 2008

Posted by bruce mcgranahan in green building.
Tags:
4 comments

Tree Hugger Consulting offers their free e-book, “Green Building 101: A Basic Guide to Building and Remodeling Sustainably.”

To order the FREE e-book, “Green Building 101,” send your request via e-mail to treehuggerconsulting@comcast.net.  They promise to have the book to you by the next business day.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Craftsman style home with $24 monthly energy bill October 4, 2008

Posted by bruce mcgranahan in green building.
Tags: , ,
add a comment

According to a post at Jetson Green LEED Platinum Home of the Future Reduces Energy Costs by 80%

SMUD Home of the Future

image from www.jetsonGreen.com

This home is the first LEED Platinum certified home in the Sacramento area.  Located in Folsom, this “Home of the Future” is the product of a collaboration between BP Solar, OCR Solar & Roofing, R.J. Walter Homes, and the Sacramento Municipal Utility District.  Working together, the focus of the home was to design it using state-of-the-art energy efficient materials.  It has dual pane windows, solar-assisted hot water and space heating, LED lighting, energy efficient appliances, and advanced framing and insulation.

According to SMUD’s Mike Keesee, project manager for the Home of the Future, the owner should expect to pay no more than $24 per month in combined electrical and gas bills.

At 1950 square feet, the craftsman bungalow shows that no matter what the design style, you can use certain technology and materials to curb energy use and live in a healthy, stylish home.  How far, though, can you actually go?

Go to Source Page >>>

Enhanced by Zemanta

900-acre community preserves 70% for open space August 21, 2008

Posted by bruce mcgranahan in green building, land use.
Tags:
add a comment

From a Post at Jetson Green

Serenbe is located in Palmetto, Georgia, about 30-45 minutes southwest of Atlanta.  The 900 acre community will preserve 70% of it’s land and eventual plans include about 600 homes.  All Serenbe homes will be EarthCraft certified and the community offers a variety of options including work/live townhomes, cottages, and estates.  The architecture is diverse and charming and is often inspired by historical buildings.

Aerial

“there are stores, restaurants, a farm and an inn all within walking distance, made easier by planned footpaths.  Future plans even include a juice bar, holistic medical services, and assisted living. Serenbe is big on community activities and events and really aims to bring people back to a simpler time when there was a much stronger sense of community living.  Serenbe is a truly idyllic-looking community and the type of life it promises would make most people jump to buy a home there, if you can afford it.”

READ MORE AT JETSON GREEN >>>

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Environmentally-friendly roof tiles from EcoStar August 20, 2008

Posted by bruce mcgranahan in green building.
Tags: ,
1 comment so far

A post at ecofriend introduced me to EcoStar roofing.  According to the post

The role of a roof is to protect a building and its occupants as well as contents from the effects of weather. However EcoStar has come up with a line of roof tiles that not only protects us and our belongings but also helps us to protect our environment too. Aiming to reduce burden on lanfills, the company is cleverly manufacturing roofing tiles that are composed of up to 80% recycled post-industrial rubber and plastic. These post-industrial materials consist of waste that includes car bumpers and baby diaper production remnants. This in turn also saves our forests as no trees are cut for the wood nor is any land eroded for stones.


Rendering ultimate protection against harsh weather, EcoStar’s extensive line of top-quality products provides an efficient, environmentally friendly, durable and aesthetically pleasing solution for virtually any steep-slope roofing application. (more…)

Demand for green building professionals is growing August 18, 2008

Posted by bruce mcgranahan in green building.
Tags: ,
add a comment

“According to the National Association of Home Builders, the demand for green building professionals is increasing.  More than 1,000 builders, remodelers and other members of the home building industry have earned the Certified Green Professional educational designation since NAHB introduced it early this year.”

Read More at environmental LEADER >>>

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

GeoSolar Community in Arvada, Colorado August 11, 2008

Posted by bruce mcgranahan in green building.
Tags: ,
add a comment

From Jetson Green

Geos, a Sustainable GeoSolar Community


Geos is a community located in Arvada, Colorado.  With homes starting in the low $200,000, it is an affordable green community seeking status as the first fossil fuel free community in the United States.  The homes combine the benefits of both geothermal and solar energy.  Homes range from 850 to 3500+ square feet and include a variety of living options from live/work townhomes to single level flats.

Geos will be comprised of a network of plazas, parks, and trails encouraging a pedestrian, social community.  It’s unique as a community that eliminates the need for fossil fuels is.  Some other “green” communities may not even include geothermal or solar.

The home prices are also an important part of this community.  The planners wanted to make a green community that was accessible for the average person, not just the elite.  Geos is still in the early stages, but it promises to be a revolutionary and inspirational community.  To learn more, visit their website.

Zemanta Pixie

Does it cost more to NOT build green? August 7, 2008

Posted by bruce mcgranahan in energy, green building, waste reduction.
Tags: , ,
1 comment so far

From Green Building Elements
comes the “Costs of NOT Building Green“:

Despite the narrowing gap in cost between green building and traditional “to-code” building, most builders and home buyers still perceive the green option to be significantly more expensive.  The reality is that due to increased builder education and an influx of affordable green building products, a building can be built green within the same budget as a non-green building.  According to Clark Wilson, CEO of Austin based Green Builders, Inc., “It’s our job as builders to find those green products that don’t drive up the price of the home.”  For an informative breakdown on how green buildings cost from 0 to 2% more than non-green buildings, check out “The True Costs of Building Green” from the folks at Buildings.com.

Now that green building is an affordable option, it’s time to change the way we frame the affordability debate.  Too long have supporters of green building been on the defensive, forced to justify the costs of building more energy efficient, healthier, more sustainable homes.  Instead of focusing on the costs of making your building green, let’s talk about the costs of not building green.

Energy

With the help of the EPA’s ENERGY STAR program, advances in energy efficiency have resulted in savings of 40 to 60% over non-green buildings.  Add in the water savings from low-flow fixtures, tankless water heaters, very efficient appliances, greywater systems, water-friendly landscaping, and rainwater collection systems and it’s clear how wasteful a non-green building can be.

Health

Paints, adhesives, and caulks can all contain volatile organic compounds (VOCs,) the greatest causes of indoor air pollution in the home, which have been tied to increased asthma rates.  Wood products in the home can contain urea-formaldehyde, a known carcinogen that is banned in Canada and Europe and soon will be on its way out in California. The Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory studied indoor air pollution in homes and “found moderate to strong increases in respiratory and allergic health effects among children in homes with higher concentrations of selected VOCs.”The potential health risks of non-green buildings are reason enough for many to choose to build green.

Sustainability

Third in the green trinity is sustainability, the environmental cost of your building project.  Green builders start by significantly reducing waste on building sites.  While building materials that are not recycled or made from renewable materials might seem less expensive, the cost to the environment must be considered.  And it’s not just the sustainability of the product that should be considered, but the company’s manufacturing process as well.  Companies that have earned the Cradle to Cradle certification represent the height of sustainability.

Read More at the Source Page >>>

Zemanta Pixie

Do “green” home improvements increase resale value? August 6, 2008

Posted by bruce mcgranahan in energy, green building.
Tags: , ,
add a comment

Low Impact Living: The Bottom Line — Green Home Upgrades & Home Values

From green building elements.com

With many cities experiencing a real estate “slump”, homeowners around the country are looking for ways to stand out from the slew of homes on the market, while improving their home’s resale value. Other homeowners are planning for the future: a future of ever-rising energy prices. Regardless of your situation, you may be asking yourself if green home improvements increase the home’s value. The answer isn’t as straight-forward as some might hope.

According to a post at building elements.com the first thing to remember about real estate value is “location, location, location.” Like any home improvement, the return on your investment will depend on the value of your house and others in the neighborhood, as well as the local market. Other factors like the quality of the workmanship, and how soon you move after making the improvements weigh in as well. Here are some points to consider:

· Green amenities and features may not appeal to everyone, but energy- and money-saving green features will.

· If you’re building a new house, or diving into a significant remodel, you might want to consider getting it certified as green. At resale, certification can provide buyers interested in all kinds of green benefits assurance that they are getting what they paid for.

Nationally, the US Green Building Council, developers of the LEED rating system, have put forth a new residential certification called LEED for Homes. LEED certified homes use less energy, water and natural resources, and their construction creates less waste, among other benefits. LEED is probably the most well-know certification standard in the US, mainly due to its widespread commercial acceptance. Other nationwide programs include the Environments for Living certification, which includes an energy usage guarantee, and the EnergyStar program, which focuses on home energy efficiency.

· Many green homeowners dream of living “off the grid”, meaning that they can supply all of the energy needed to power their home. Solar can be all or part of this equation. Technologies are improving with promises of more affordable solar on the horizon. But for now, residential solar installations are still expensive. State and federal tax incentives can help. For the past three years the US government has offered homeowners a 30% tax credit on solar projects (including photovoltaic systems and solar hot water heaters) up to a maximum of $2,000 per project. However, this incentive is set to expire at the end of the year and may not be extended. Some states provide tax breaks and rebates for solar installations, so take a look at the Database of State Incentives for Renewables and Efficiency (DSIRE) to find out what you may qualify for. Thirty-five states, including Virginia, offer net metering.

With the evolution of solar’s efficiencies, cost reductions, and net metering, payback periods for the original homeowner can now be in the single digits. But what about when you sell your home? Can you recoup that investment? Since residential solar installations are still relatively rare, it’s difficult to say. To answer the question, appraisers are using this rule of thumb: half of the cost of a solar installation can be recouped at selling time. Or you can look at it from the energy savings perspective: according to The Appraisal Journal, every $1 decrease in energy costs results in a $10 to $25 increase in home values. If this holds true, eliminating a $1200 annual electricity bill translates into at least a $12,000 increase in home price.

Go to Source Page >>>

Oberlin College going green July 31, 2008

Posted by bruce mcgranahan in green building.
Tags: ,
add a comment

From inhabitat

OBERLIN COLLEGE: Setting a Sustainable Example in Ohio

by Evelyn Lee

Just north of I-80, between Toledo and Cleveland, is an unexpected educational facility that is setting a shining example of sustainable building for ecological and human health. Completed in 2000, the Adam Joseph Lewis Center for Environmental Studies is an ongoing green build experiment, as its energy performance is studied and adjusted as green technologies continue to evolve. We wouldn’t expect less from Inhabitat favorite William McDonough + Partners, but were surprised to find that this particular PV-powered experiment was taking place in Ohio. It just goes to show that you don’t have to live in sunny California in order to efficiently harvest solar power.

As the keystone building of Oberlin College’s Environmental Studies program, the Adam Joseph Lewis Center is ensuring that their students get hands-on training, by experiencing an ecologically friendly environment on a daily basis. All the materials within the center are recycled, reused, or sustainably grown and harvested. All of the fixtures and systems from the lighting, the plumbing, the air-conditioning are energy efficient and passive whenever possible. The interior and exterior landscape of the building contains a variety of constructed native northern Ohio ecosystems that not only provide food, but also provide responsible stormwater management and storage. The unique landscape ecosystem houses an onsite ‘living machine’ that naturally cleanses and recycles wastewater for reuse.

+ Adam Joseph Lewis Center
+ William McDonough + Parnters

Go to Source Page >>>

Zemanta Pixie